Skip to main content

Hacking

(Published in Manila Standard Today under the Greenlight Column, June 20, 2011)

More than 360,000 of Citigroup Inc.’s U.S. credit card customers’ data was breached by hackers according to a statement of the bank posted in its website. This is the latest of the string of large-scale hacking and data breach against high-profile companies, and the cost to them is becoming staggering.

In April, Sony’s Playstation Network was attacked by hackers which affected more than 100 million online accounts. Sony expects it will cost it ¥14 billion (US$170 million) this financial year.

Earlier this month, Google blamed China of trying to hack the accounts of several hundred of Gmail account holders that included U.S. government officials, journalists, and Chinese human rights activists.

These statements from Google could seriously hurt its business. In fact last year, the Obama administration took up Google's complaints about hacking and censorship from China. Afterwards, Google partially pulled out of China, which resulted to a loss in market share to rival Baidu in China's huge Internet market.

In Citigroup’s case, letters were sent starting June 3 to people affected, and 217,657 customers have also been sent new cards, costing the company unforeseen expenditures and possible reduction in credit card use among its customers.

How hackers work
Hacking refers to various activities that include breaking passwords, writing and releasing viruses and worms, denial of service attacks, accessing restricted electronic information owned by others, or any other activities that involves accessing a computing system without the right authorization.

Hackers will release a program into the network which will record everything that is going on. After filling itself with data such as personal and financial information, the program then sends this data back to a server. The hacker, in most cases will take that data and sell it to someone interested. It is those people who but this data that will inflict more harm to the aggrieved company.

Business cost of hacking
According to data security experts, hacking and other malicious computer viruses are costing businesses globally more than $1 trillion each year. This only includes the cost of data loss and cleaning up the breach, and does not include the reparations to affected customers.
But the biggest cost of hacking, which is more often underestimated, is the loss of trust of customers. This results to the reduction in the use of a product or service, if not, the total loss of the customer himself or herself.

For instance, if you used your credit card at a certain restaurant and the card number data stolen and used for some malicious purpose a week later. Most likely you would suspect the restaurant of stealing your card number and would not patronize it anymore, even if the problem is not directly linked to the restaurant.

That’s why Sony and Citigroup are offering reparations to affected customers to avoid losing them altogether.

Protecting your company
The most important thing that your company can do is to invest in security. There are a lot of security solutions available in the market now that detects and stops potential threats to your company’s electronic data.

Your employees should also be well trained in basic security techniques in using and accessing company data, especially though the Internet. Your company also needs to have well trained professionals that run your IT system.

The proverbial “an ounce of prevention is better that a pound of cure” holds true when it comes protecting your companies electronic data.
-------------------------------
Reynaldo C. Lugtu Jr. teaches strategy, management and marketing courses in the MBA Program of De La Salle University, Graduate School of Business. He may be e-mailed at rlugtu2002@yahoo.com, or visit his blog at http://rlugtu.blogspot.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can outsourcing be stopped?

((Published in the BusinessMirror under the Mirror Image column, Nov 11, 2008) Now that President-elect Barack Obama will be inaugurated on January 20, 2009, many are holding their breath, especially the business-process outsourcing companies in India, the Philippines and others, as to how he can turn around the outsourcing of jobs from the United States. In debates and on the road, Obama repeatedly said that if elected, he would discourage companies from “shipping jobs overseas” by taking away tax breaks, or by giving benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically. “We can keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, or we can give tax benefits to companies that invest right here in New Hampshire,” Senator Obama said at a joint appearance with Sen. Hillary Clinton in Unity, New Hampshire. According to CIO magazine, economists and legal advisers contacted about those comments said they are unaware of any specific tax breaks aimed at offshoring or outsourcing ...

Facebook addiction

(Published in Manila Standard Today under the Greenlight Column, January 10, 2011) I was recently invited by a Communications Arts class of De La Salle University to talk about the ill effects of Facebook among the youth. “Ill effects among the youth?”, I asked. I have studied the good, the bad, and the ugly sides of Facebook in the workplace. We always see its good side because most of us are active users. But the dark side in the work place is apparently the decline of productivity based on a number of studies. But understanding the ill effects among the youth struck me because I have two teenage daughters who spend hours in the veritable social network site; and I oftentimes ask them to stop and instead concentrate on studying. So this topic interested me as I wanted to understand its potential ill effects to my kids. Surveying Facebook users To put some credence in the talk, I asked the student organizers and my daughter to help me to conduct an exploratory study through a...

Can outsourcing be stopped, really?

(Published in Business Mirror under the Free Enterprise column, January 11, 2012) IN 2008, I wrote an article in BusinessMirror titled “Can outsourcing be stopped?” where I mentioned Barack Obama’s repeated spiel in his campaigns that, if elected, he would discourage companies from “shipping jobs overseas” by taking away tax breaks, or by giving benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically. From then on, the US government did not have a clear policy on outsourcing; thus, the business process outsourcing industry in the Philippines and elsewhere like India still experienced spectacular double-digit growth, helping spur the economies of the two countries. But just last week, President Obama jumpstarted an effort to urge US business leaders to keep jobs at home instead of outsourcing them overseas as he rolled out a new election-year theme aimed at courting middle-class voters. This has been the long-standing campaign of the US government against outsourcing, which was...