Skip to main content

Managing transitions

(Published in Manila Standard Today under the Greenlight Column, April 18, 2011)

A local bank recently invited me to deliver a talk to its senior executives about managing change and transitions. This is opportune time for the bank as it is undergoing changes and its attendant transition in areas of strategy and organizational structure changes.

My talk centered on how to manage transitions in particular as opposed to managing change. There is a distinct difference. Change is situational, an event. It happens when something starts or stops. Transition is psychological. It’s a psychological process that a person goes through to detach from his/her old identity and become directed to a new one. Transition takes longer than changes, and this is where the complication comes in – the roller coaster ride of emotions involved among those affected by the change. These are the wisdom behind the seminal book of William Bridges, “Managing Transitions”.

It was an interesting talk because I related my experience as a senior executive and chief executive of a company in leading and managing change and transitions. Our organizations initiate planned and unplanned changes in response to the ever changing environment.

In fact, in the 2010 CEO Study conducted by IBM on a global scale, eight out of ten CEOs expect high to very high levels of complexity in the business environment over the next vive years, and less than half feel prepared to handle it. There is a glaring 30% “complexity gap” that CEOs are confronted with such as entry of new competition, war for talent, and changing customer tastes. Hence, CEOs implement more changes such as structures and policies for quick decision making, improvements in customer intimacy and insight, and simplification of products and processes.

These changes oftentimes result to changes in strategies, structures, and policies. Employees likewise face changes in forms of reorganizations, a change in role or promotion or change in boss. Organizations and people in transition follow three phases as outlined in the framework of Bridges.

The First Phase
Whereas change is usually situational and focused on a new state or objective, transitions begin with letting go of the old ways of doing things and leaving the comfort zone. For example, employees affected by a change in structure may find them selves doing a different role or doing other tasks.

Letting go of the old ways is difficult and may entail casting out old beliefs and assumptions. The task of a manager is to help people deal with the employees tangible and intangible losses and mentally prepare them to move on. This can be achieved by compensating for the possible losses to people, giving information repeatedly, and showing how endings ensure the continuity of what really matters.

The Second Phase
This phase is the most critical phase as its management will determine the progression to the next. This is an uncomfortable place where people go through psychological adjustments. This is when anxiety rises and motivation falls among employees; where productivity suffers and old weaknesses reemerge with a vengeance; where the organization is vulnerable to attack from the outside and sabotage within.

This is when managers help get employees get through it, and capitalizing on all the confusion by encouraging them to be innovators. This is the phase where communication is key. The manager should strengthen the channels of communication and relationships.

The Third Phase
Finally, after the journey through the tumultuous stage, a rebirth happens. This manifests itself through noticeable changes in people’s behavior and attitudes towards work and the change that’s taking place.

The role of the manager is to help people develop the new sense of identity, experience renewed energy, and discover the new sense of purpose that make employees reenergized to work anew. Managers capitalize by communicating the vision and goals of the company. This is also the phase where managers identify resources, and provide knowledge and skill training,. To build self esteem and confidence among employees, managers should identify and celebrate small successes.

For managers to achieve the desired outcome of the change program, they must progress through all the three phases. Some transitions may be fast taking only months while others will take years. But what’s key is being aware of the phases, being conscious of the actions that needs to be taken, and being sensitive of the progressions from one phase to another.

-------------------------------
Reynaldo C. Lugtu Jr. teaches strategy, management and marketing courses in the MBA Program of De La Salle University, Graduate School of Business. He may be e-mailed at rlugtu2002@yahoo.com, or visit his blog at http://rlugtu.blogspot.com.

Comments

I like your distinction between managing transitions and managing change. An important difference to acknowledge.

Popular posts from this blog

Can outsourcing be stopped?

((Published in the BusinessMirror under the Mirror Image column, Nov 11, 2008) Now that President-elect Barack Obama will be inaugurated on January 20, 2009, many are holding their breath, especially the business-process outsourcing companies in India, the Philippines and others, as to how he can turn around the outsourcing of jobs from the United States. In debates and on the road, Obama repeatedly said that if elected, he would discourage companies from “shipping jobs overseas” by taking away tax breaks, or by giving benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically. “We can keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, or we can give tax benefits to companies that invest right here in New Hampshire,” Senator Obama said at a joint appearance with Sen. Hillary Clinton in Unity, New Hampshire. According to CIO magazine, economists and legal advisers contacted about those comments said they are unaware of any specific tax breaks aimed at offshoring or outsourcing

Innovation in BPO

(Published in the Business Mirror under the Mirror Image Column, Sept 12, 2007) The BPO sector has grown by spectacular levels, providing employment to more than 200,000 BPO professionals. It is projected to grow on the average 38 percent until 2010, contributing more than $12 billion in revenue. Similar to the experience of India, much of the growth in the Philippine BPO sector has been driven by relatively lower labor costs. This has been the salient characteristic of the first phase of global BPO development which took place in the 90’s through the early 2000’s, where clients and providers alike placed emphasis on cost, efficiency and productivity. As clients in the US and Europe searched for ways to bring down cost further, they turned to providers in India, Philippines, and others to provide low labor costs to perform customer care, HR, and accounting BPO services. As established BPO providers are besieged by new entrants from China, Latin America, and other relatively lower cost

Future of outsourcing and offshoring

(Published in Business World under the View from Taft column, June 18, 2009) Amid the mixed forecasts on the global economic rebound, experts on the outsourcing and offshoring industry are consistently painting a rosy picture toward the end of the year. According to the 2009 edition of the Black Book of Outsourcing, more than half of companies polled say they expect their spending on outsourcing services to come back and return to pre-recession levels. Similarly, a Business Processing Association of the Philippine (BPA/P) survey among industry players showed that 96% of respondents representing organizations that provide non-voice Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) services believe that 2009 prospects for their organizations are good, excellent, or outstanding. More than half of the respondents, 51%, said prospects are excellent. All these forecasts bode well for the local industry, but more likely than not, the industry will never be the same after the global slump that we are experie