Skip to main content

Nonverbal cues

(Published in the Manila Standard Today under the Greenlight column, September 6, 2010)

I recently attended a business meeting in Thailand where colleagues from Asia Pacific countries gathered to present and discuss business priorities. A favorite dinner staple topic among my colleagues was the hostage crisis in Manila. But more interestingly was the observation of many on the speech delivered by President Aquino to the local and international press where he smiled instead of showing grief.

Having read the explanation of President Aquino, I quickly defended him. I told everyone that the president’s smile has been misunderstood – he was smiling because of the absurdity of the situation with the police using a sledge hammer and the difficulty of breaching the bus. I also told everyone that the President apologized for having offended certain people.

This makes us realize the importance of understanding nonverbal communication in diplomacy and international business. According to studies, more than 90 percent of the content of a message is contained in non-verbal cues. Fifty five percent of the content of a message may be transmitted by facial expression alone, such as smiling and frowning. Thirty five percent of the message content is derived from inflection and tone of the voice. Only 7 percent of the message content is due to the words in the message.

This lends nonverbal cues great importance in interpersonal and public communication. But because nonverbal messages take place on a subliminal level, it makes it more difficult to understand and master when differences in cultures are involved. Nonverbal cues are open to misinterpretation when one does not understand its meaning outside our own culture.

For instance, eye contact in Western cultures is associated with openness and sincerity. But in some other cultures, it is considered rude and discourteous. People from cultures who use a lot of touch could unintentionally appear inappropriately friendly in more reserved cultures. An Italian friend would greet my other friends with at least two kisses on the cheek. Some understood the expression, others looked at my friend with amazement.

Non-verbal communication and behavior can be governed by situation. Professionals and executives in formal meetings are conscious of the expressions and words they say. Similarly, in informal settings like dinners and drinks, the same executives can loosen up and convey less restrained nonverbal cues. But in both situations, one danger area is the use of humor and subtle meanings which may be conveyed by the tone of the voice, but may be misinterpreted and missed among other cultures.

So how do we deal with nonverbal communication? First is to become aware of the cultural nuances of verbal and nonverbal communication. Sensitivity and cross-cultural training can reduce nonverbal errors when working with individuals from other cultures. Awareness of the situation at hand is also important to understand the underlying perceptions and behaviors of other participants.

Second, we have to be more aware of our perceptions and behavioral patterns. Do we have biases and stereotypes that limit our understanding of other cultures? How do we feel when a Westerner colleague speaks to us in a more powerful tone and aggressive facial expressions?

We also have to be more observant of others so we learn their nonverbal cues. Take note of similarities and differences in traits and expressions.
We can also try to get feedback from colleagues and friends on how they react to nonverbal cues. The key is building cultural sensitivity by better understanding how others feel and react, and from there we ourselves adjust to the situation.
-------------------------------
Reynaldo C. Lugtu Jr. teaches management and marketing courses in the MBA Program of De La Salle University College of Business. He may be e-mailed at rlugtu2002@yahoo.com, or visit his blog at http://rlugtu.blogspot.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can outsourcing be stopped?

((Published in the BusinessMirror under the Mirror Image column, Nov 11, 2008) Now that President-elect Barack Obama will be inaugurated on January 20, 2009, many are holding their breath, especially the business-process outsourcing companies in India, the Philippines and others, as to how he can turn around the outsourcing of jobs from the United States. In debates and on the road, Obama repeatedly said that if elected, he would discourage companies from “shipping jobs overseas” by taking away tax breaks, or by giving benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically. “We can keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, or we can give tax benefits to companies that invest right here in New Hampshire,” Senator Obama said at a joint appearance with Sen. Hillary Clinton in Unity, New Hampshire. According to CIO magazine, economists and legal advisers contacted about those comments said they are unaware of any specific tax breaks aimed at offshoring or outsourcing

Innovation in BPO

(Published in the Business Mirror under the Mirror Image Column, Sept 12, 2007) The BPO sector has grown by spectacular levels, providing employment to more than 200,000 BPO professionals. It is projected to grow on the average 38 percent until 2010, contributing more than $12 billion in revenue. Similar to the experience of India, much of the growth in the Philippine BPO sector has been driven by relatively lower labor costs. This has been the salient characteristic of the first phase of global BPO development which took place in the 90’s through the early 2000’s, where clients and providers alike placed emphasis on cost, efficiency and productivity. As clients in the US and Europe searched for ways to bring down cost further, they turned to providers in India, Philippines, and others to provide low labor costs to perform customer care, HR, and accounting BPO services. As established BPO providers are besieged by new entrants from China, Latin America, and other relatively lower cost

Future of outsourcing and offshoring

(Published in Business World under the View from Taft column, June 18, 2009) Amid the mixed forecasts on the global economic rebound, experts on the outsourcing and offshoring industry are consistently painting a rosy picture toward the end of the year. According to the 2009 edition of the Black Book of Outsourcing, more than half of companies polled say they expect their spending on outsourcing services to come back and return to pre-recession levels. Similarly, a Business Processing Association of the Philippine (BPA/P) survey among industry players showed that 96% of respondents representing organizations that provide non-voice Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) services believe that 2009 prospects for their organizations are good, excellent, or outstanding. More than half of the respondents, 51%, said prospects are excellent. All these forecasts bode well for the local industry, but more likely than not, the industry will never be the same after the global slump that we are experie