Skip to main content

Nonverbal cues

(Published in the Manila Standard Today under the Greenlight column, September 6, 2010)

I recently attended a business meeting in Thailand where colleagues from Asia Pacific countries gathered to present and discuss business priorities. A favorite dinner staple topic among my colleagues was the hostage crisis in Manila. But more interestingly was the observation of many on the speech delivered by President Aquino to the local and international press where he smiled instead of showing grief.

Having read the explanation of President Aquino, I quickly defended him. I told everyone that the president’s smile has been misunderstood – he was smiling because of the absurdity of the situation with the police using a sledge hammer and the difficulty of breaching the bus. I also told everyone that the President apologized for having offended certain people.

This makes us realize the importance of understanding nonverbal communication in diplomacy and international business. According to studies, more than 90 percent of the content of a message is contained in non-verbal cues. Fifty five percent of the content of a message may be transmitted by facial expression alone, such as smiling and frowning. Thirty five percent of the message content is derived from inflection and tone of the voice. Only 7 percent of the message content is due to the words in the message.

This lends nonverbal cues great importance in interpersonal and public communication. But because nonverbal messages take place on a subliminal level, it makes it more difficult to understand and master when differences in cultures are involved. Nonverbal cues are open to misinterpretation when one does not understand its meaning outside our own culture.

For instance, eye contact in Western cultures is associated with openness and sincerity. But in some other cultures, it is considered rude and discourteous. People from cultures who use a lot of touch could unintentionally appear inappropriately friendly in more reserved cultures. An Italian friend would greet my other friends with at least two kisses on the cheek. Some understood the expression, others looked at my friend with amazement.

Non-verbal communication and behavior can be governed by situation. Professionals and executives in formal meetings are conscious of the expressions and words they say. Similarly, in informal settings like dinners and drinks, the same executives can loosen up and convey less restrained nonverbal cues. But in both situations, one danger area is the use of humor and subtle meanings which may be conveyed by the tone of the voice, but may be misinterpreted and missed among other cultures.

So how do we deal with nonverbal communication? First is to become aware of the cultural nuances of verbal and nonverbal communication. Sensitivity and cross-cultural training can reduce nonverbal errors when working with individuals from other cultures. Awareness of the situation at hand is also important to understand the underlying perceptions and behaviors of other participants.

Second, we have to be more aware of our perceptions and behavioral patterns. Do we have biases and stereotypes that limit our understanding of other cultures? How do we feel when a Westerner colleague speaks to us in a more powerful tone and aggressive facial expressions?

We also have to be more observant of others so we learn their nonverbal cues. Take note of similarities and differences in traits and expressions.
We can also try to get feedback from colleagues and friends on how they react to nonverbal cues. The key is building cultural sensitivity by better understanding how others feel and react, and from there we ourselves adjust to the situation.
-------------------------------
Reynaldo C. Lugtu Jr. teaches management and marketing courses in the MBA Program of De La Salle University College of Business. He may be e-mailed at rlugtu2002@yahoo.com, or visit his blog at http://rlugtu.blogspot.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can outsourcing be stopped?

((Published in the BusinessMirror under the Mirror Image column, Nov 11, 2008) Now that President-elect Barack Obama will be inaugurated on January 20, 2009, many are holding their breath, especially the business-process outsourcing companies in India, the Philippines and others, as to how he can turn around the outsourcing of jobs from the United States. In debates and on the road, Obama repeatedly said that if elected, he would discourage companies from “shipping jobs overseas” by taking away tax breaks, or by giving benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically. “We can keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, or we can give tax benefits to companies that invest right here in New Hampshire,” Senator Obama said at a joint appearance with Sen. Hillary Clinton in Unity, New Hampshire. According to CIO magazine, economists and legal advisers contacted about those comments said they are unaware of any specific tax breaks aimed at offshoring or outsourcing ...

Can outsourcing be stopped, really?

(Published in Business Mirror under the Free Enterprise column, January 11, 2012) IN 2008, I wrote an article in BusinessMirror titled “Can outsourcing be stopped?” where I mentioned Barack Obama’s repeated spiel in his campaigns that, if elected, he would discourage companies from “shipping jobs overseas” by taking away tax breaks, or by giving benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically. From then on, the US government did not have a clear policy on outsourcing; thus, the business process outsourcing industry in the Philippines and elsewhere like India still experienced spectacular double-digit growth, helping spur the economies of the two countries. But just last week, President Obama jumpstarted an effort to urge US business leaders to keep jobs at home instead of outsourcing them overseas as he rolled out a new election-year theme aimed at courting middle-class voters. This has been the long-standing campaign of the US government against outsourcing, which was...

Renewable energy

(Published in Business Mirror under Mirror Image column, April 13, 2011) Another round of oil-price increase! The Department of Energy (DOE) confirmed this on Sunday due to the continuing rise in global crude prices from $4 to $5 per barrel. If this pushes through, this would be the 12th time oil companies increase their price since the year started, as the unrest in the oil-producing countries of the Middle East continues to escalate. This is the perennial dilemma of our country as an importer of fuels and oil for our energy needs. It means that when the price of oil increases, Filipinos have to bear the brunt of the upward spiral of fuel and power costs. It is opportune time for the government and the private sector to focus on the development of renewable energy (RE). Using RE means that we use energy sources that are not clean and reliable, but sustainable, such that it addresses our country’s problem on energy security. Since the signing of the Renewable Energy Act of 2008,...