Skip to main content

The meaning of teams and teamwork

(Published in The Manila Times under the Managing for Society Column, Oct 4, 2005)

TEAM” and “teamwork” are perhaps the most frequently used terms in organizations today. This is because these are already established concepts in management practice. There is also a proliferation of leadership seminars and books alluding to these terms. Even government and various sectors of society often use teamwork with reference to national unity.

Despite these, many managers misuse, if not abuse, the words “team” and “teamwork.” Some think that any group of employees working together is a team and, therefore, should exhibit teamwork. Some believe that any management grouping, like a committee or council, may be called a team. Many managers hope to motivate and engender “good feelings” among their subordinates and other organization members by simply addressing them as “team members.” Still others openly advocate teamwork, but fail to demonstrate the values and beha­viors that lead to it.

So what is a team? What is teamwork? Katzenbach and Smith, who did research on teams and authored the book The Wisdom of Team—Creating the High-Performance Organization, operationally define a team as “a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable.” All the elements of this definition, according to the authors, are what make high-performance teams successful. What are the particulars of these team elements?

First, for pragmatic reasons, a team has to be small. A team of ten is more likely to succeed than one of fifty due to more efficient interaction and coordination among the members. Smaller teams are easier to manage logistically in terms of meeting place and time. According to Katzen­bach and Smith, work groups larger than twenty have difficulty becoming a real team, because they are often unable to develop a common purpose, goal, approach and mutual accountability.

Second, a team should have complementary skills among its members, such as technical or functional expertise, problem-solving and decision-making skills, and interpersonal skills. For instance, launching a new wireless Internet service would require a team with wireless and Internet technology know-how and marketing skills apart from the problem-solving ability of its members.

Third, a team should be committed to a common purpose and performance goals. It is imperative that both go together. The team’s short-term performance goals should be tied to its overall purpose to avoid confusion and to ensure cohesive performance beha­viors among the members. For instance, launching a new product or service at a certain date may be the purpose of the team, and performance goals may include aspects of product design and reliability, cost and pricing, and the marketing plan.

Fourth, a team should develop a common approach. Members must agree on task responsibilities, the schedule of regular meetings, skills needed to accomplish the goals, and decision-making processes. This will ensure that individual skills are integrated and action plans are implemented toward achieving team goals.

Last, and perhaps the most important, is that a team should hold itself accountable. This is more than responsibility and is supported by commitment and trust. When team members hold themselves accountable to the team’s goals, each will be committed to the achievement of this goal. Accountability and commitment allow members to openly express their views about all facets of the team effort and be constructively listened to.

The foregoing components of a team are absolute necessities to ensure high performance. But what fuses these components together to energize the team members toward achieving a goal is a set of shared values known as “teamwork.” Katzenbach and Smith define teamwork as “a set of values that encourages beha­viors, such as listening and constructively responding to points of view expressed by others, giving others the benefit of the doubt, providing support to those who need it, and recognizing the interests and achievements of others.”

Technically, the entire workforce of an organization can never be a team, but it can believe in and practice teamwork. Leaders and managers can help the various teams in their organization reach superior performance by developing and promoting teamwork.

Similarly, our country can benefit from an understanding of teams and teamwork. As our coun­try faces yet more looming energy and financial crises, we, including the government, can learn from the principles of teams and teamwork. These principles can be transferred to and practiced in communities where teams can be organized for worthy causes such as energy conservation, livelihood development for the indi­gents, proper garbage collection and waste disposal, and the like.

As in an organization, teamwork can be practiced by the entire nation to achieve our long-standing goal of national unity and progress. The government and various sectors of society can practice teamwork by engaging in a national dialogue characterized by cooperation instead of division, and where representative leaders will truly listen and provide mutual support toward achieving our collective goals.

----------------
Reynaldo Lugtu, Jr. is a student in the Doctor of Business Administration Program and lecturer in management principles under the MBA program of the Graduate School of Business, De La Salle Professional School. He is a client executive at an IT services company. He may be e-mailed at rlugtu2002@yahoo.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can outsourcing be stopped?

((Published in the BusinessMirror under the Mirror Image column, Nov 11, 2008) Now that President-elect Barack Obama will be inaugurated on January 20, 2009, many are holding their breath, especially the business-process outsourcing companies in India, the Philippines and others, as to how he can turn around the outsourcing of jobs from the United States. In debates and on the road, Obama repeatedly said that if elected, he would discourage companies from “shipping jobs overseas” by taking away tax breaks, or by giving benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically. “We can keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, or we can give tax benefits to companies that invest right here in New Hampshire,” Senator Obama said at a joint appearance with Sen. Hillary Clinton in Unity, New Hampshire. According to CIO magazine, economists and legal advisers contacted about those comments said they are unaware of any specific tax breaks aimed at offshoring or outsourcing

Innovation in BPO

(Published in the Business Mirror under the Mirror Image Column, Sept 12, 2007) The BPO sector has grown by spectacular levels, providing employment to more than 200,000 BPO professionals. It is projected to grow on the average 38 percent until 2010, contributing more than $12 billion in revenue. Similar to the experience of India, much of the growth in the Philippine BPO sector has been driven by relatively lower labor costs. This has been the salient characteristic of the first phase of global BPO development which took place in the 90’s through the early 2000’s, where clients and providers alike placed emphasis on cost, efficiency and productivity. As clients in the US and Europe searched for ways to bring down cost further, they turned to providers in India, Philippines, and others to provide low labor costs to perform customer care, HR, and accounting BPO services. As established BPO providers are besieged by new entrants from China, Latin America, and other relatively lower cost

Future of outsourcing and offshoring

(Published in Business World under the View from Taft column, June 18, 2009) Amid the mixed forecasts on the global economic rebound, experts on the outsourcing and offshoring industry are consistently painting a rosy picture toward the end of the year. According to the 2009 edition of the Black Book of Outsourcing, more than half of companies polled say they expect their spending on outsourcing services to come back and return to pre-recession levels. Similarly, a Business Processing Association of the Philippine (BPA/P) survey among industry players showed that 96% of respondents representing organizations that provide non-voice Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) services believe that 2009 prospects for their organizations are good, excellent, or outstanding. More than half of the respondents, 51%, said prospects are excellent. All these forecasts bode well for the local industry, but more likely than not, the industry will never be the same after the global slump that we are experie